If the negotiations focused on a specific personal injury claim fail to yield a settlement, the 2 disputing parties might elect to proceed to a trial. If that is the case, then a deposition hearing must precede that trial. A plaintiff that has spent only a minimal amount of time in a courtroom might want to know what sort of questions could be posed by either of the lawyers present at that pre-trial session.
One way that such a plaintiff could address any concerns
The plaintiff’s concerns might disappear, or at least subside, if he or she were to study the available information on the accident that triggered the filing of a personal injury claim. That information would include the police report, any recorded statements, the medical report, along with the medical bills, and any other filed papers.
What types of questions could a plaintiff expect at a personal injury deposition?
Questions on the plaintiff’s background: Basic contact information, such as the plaintiff’s address. Details on the witness’/plaintiff’s current job, along with the related job history.
An attempt to learn whether or not the plaintiff had filed any previous lawsuits, against a different party;
An inquiry into any past illnesses or hospital visits;
An effort to learn whether or not the witness/plaintiff had been tried for any past felonies.
Questions that focus on details about the accident that triggered the personal injury claim.
Questions about the injuries caused by that same accident.
Encouraging the recall of any time when the plaintiff needed to limit the level of his or her activities.
Encouraging the recall of those times when the injured witness when some specific aspect of the witness’ life had been affected?
How can the person asked such questions feel confident of giving a good answer?
The answer should be truthful. That is why a well-prepared plaintiff/witness has taken the time to study the available documents. Moreover, facts that are not recalled should not lead to the blurting-out of a guess.
In addition, anything said should demonstrate an unquestionable level of consistency. Investigators for the insurance company may have taken video footage, or may have studied pictures on various networking sites.
If the testimony mentioned limited movement, in regards to some activity, then that same movement should not be found in any pictures taken or found by investigators. The Personal Injury Lawyer in St. Catharines know that discovery of such a movement in any picture or video clip would count as an inconsistency.
The need for consistency does not end when the deposition is over. It continues during the trial. Any statement made during the deposition should match with testimony on the same subject, when it gets presented in the courtroom. A consistent answer is a good answer.