In certain provinces within Canada, a concern for human rights has led to restrictions on the rights of specific canine brands. The humans of concern to legislatures were all those that had been victimized by and bitten by a dog. Statistics suggest that a majority of such victims could be described as children or teens. They are eligible to file for claims with the help of personal injury lawyer in St. Catharines.
Findings that helped to trigger creation of the ban
• Cities with such a breed specific ban have fewer reports of dog bites.
• Cities with such a breed specific ban have fewer reported hospitalizations.
• There are fewer young victims of a canine attack in localities with one of these special bans.
Arguments made by those that objected to ban’s creation
• A wide range or species was affected. It affected not just standard-sized pit bulls, but pit bull terriers as well. It affected both Staffordshire bull terriers and American Staffordshire terriers. Indeed, it applied to any dog with the appearance of a pit bull.
• Experts on canines say that a dog’s temperament gets affected by more than its breed.
• The same experts also say that there is no objective way to establish a dog’s lineage.
What was forbidden, following institution of the ban
• The owning of pit bulls was forbidden.
• The importing of pit bulls was forbidden.
• Ban called for an end to the breeding of pit bulls’ puppies.
Alternative approaches, suggested by those that objected to ban
Place a huge fine on any dog owner that allowed that same canine to attack and injure an innocent human. Fine any owner that failed to control the pet that had escaped the consequences of any ban’s restrictions. Encourage a spaying and neutering of those pet dogs that were of the same breed as the one mentioned in the ban. Such procedures keep a canine from displaying a typical reproductive function.
Possible consequence of ban
Breeders might well try to hide their participation in the banned activity. Breeders might feel reluctant to go after all the vaccinations that their pets ought to be receiving. That could shorten the life of the unvaccinated animal. Consider the breeder’s interest in having any female live for a long time. Breeders would be more interested in allowing each of their canines to breed a couple times and to produce puppies. After that, the life of the puppies would be the breeders’ chief concern.
If the above were to take place, following the start of the ban’s enforcement, any one bite could be very dangerous to the targeted human. In that respect a decline in the number of bites would be almost irrelevant. Moreover, because such a wide-range of species had been affected, the problem would exist within more than one species.